Thanks, I would also like to point out the same article can be found here (I did a search on your photo before you provided the site to read it), any way I read over this website, it does have references to several good pieces of information. I would suggest everyone that reads it takes the time to either pick up a book, or even do a google search on any of the information on that site, you will find a lot of the information they use has more to it , that they neglected to add to there site.
I especially like the information they have on the Cambrian explosion, they tend to leave out the fact that most information of that period comes from one amazing deposit, fossil evidence from earlier periods has been found to support the theory, it doesn’t all start there like they imply. Also when they mention that all forms found there remain the same today, I find it quite deceiving when scientists talk about these forms they are talking of forms such as bilateral or radial symmetry, not the animals skeletal structure, and species that are abundant today. They tend to word it as if those animals that we saw then looked exactly like those we see today.
Either was it is worth reading, I just see someone read one thing without looking up the information being used in it’s original context.
Edit, got caught up in thought and forgot to post the link, sorry, here it is.,
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/natu...tory_1_05.html
Devon
Linear Mode
