| |
Notices |
Welcome to the sSnakeSs community. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|
View Poll Results: Do you consider creating intergrades and/or hybrids a moral or ethical thing?
|
It's a moral debate
|
|
5 |
19.23% |
It's an ethics debate
|
|
21 |
80.77% |
04-03-12, 10:07 AM
|
#16
|
Moderator
Join Date: May-2008
Location: Central New York State
Age: 59
Posts: 16,534
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron_S
This isn't true in the reptile world as it's been proven again and again. In particular the borneo bateater (retic x burm) have constantly bred with one another or back to one of it's parents lines. Hybrids in general are sterile outside the reptile world.
|
This has been true with corn/king/milk/rat crosses AND Garter snake crosses.
It has been widely debated that Infernalis and Tetrataenia have crossed in California forever in the wild, since their ranges cross and their DNA is nearly identical.
__________________
"Where would we be without the agitators of the world attaching the electrodes
of knowledge to the nipples of ignorance?"
Savannahmonitor.net
|
|
|
04-03-12, 10:07 AM
|
#17
|
Non Carborundum Illegitimi
Join Date: Mar-2010
Location: Keynsham
Age: 49
Posts: 9,556
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDN_Blood
Would you have liked to see another option? If so, what would it be?
|
As i see hybrids and intergrades in totally different lights one option in a vote wouldnt work for both situations. I think i said it all in my post tho
__________________
May you have more good days than bad
You never know how strong you are - until being strong is your only choice
There are no dark clouds - just well hidden silver linings!!
|
|
|
04-03-12, 10:11 AM
|
#18
|
Custos serpentium
Join Date: Oct-2011
Location: Ottawa
Age: 56
Posts: 1,410
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
Quote:
Originally Posted by infernalis
This has been true with corn/king/milk/rat crosses AND Garter snake crosses.
It has been widely debated that Infernalis and Tetrataenia have crossed in California forever in the wild, since their ranges cross and their DNA is nearly identical.
|
A most excellent point. If it is so readily interchangeable and territories overlap, it'll happen. If it's not so easily swappable with such compatibility, it simply won't survive. Thanks for presenting such a good example
__________________
TODD
25 years of commitment and responsibility in herpetoculture
|
|
|
04-03-12, 10:14 AM
|
#19
|
Custos serpentium
Join Date: Oct-2011
Location: Ottawa
Age: 56
Posts: 1,410
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lankyrob
As i see hybrids and intergrades in totally different lights one option in a vote wouldnt work for both situations. I think i said it all in my post tho
|
Trust me, I deliberated long and hard about what argument and options to present. In the end I actually opted to include both morals and ethics even though it's not up for debate amongst the guiding bodies. It wasn't an easy choice, which is the whole purpose of the exercise...it makes a body think
__________________
TODD
25 years of commitment and responsibility in herpetoculture
|
|
|
04-03-12, 10:24 AM
|
#20
|
Member
Join Date: Feb-2012
Location: Maple Ridge
Posts: 99
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
This is a tough one and my answer is different depending on the circumstances. If you are dealing with an animal that is rare both in the wild and captivity, they should never be messed with other than to do what we can to bring their (as pure as possible without too much in-breeding) numbers up. I think we have an obligation to protect the original animal.
I don't know how this would function, but I think we also need to protect localities when and where we can. I understand they are not truly different animals, but they do seem to carry a collection of unique attributes and those are worth preserving. How and to what degree is a personal question. I do like it when a breeder shows dedication to an original form, but I'm no zealot.
Where the animal is very common, there is more latitude IMO. Intergrades of certain species make more sense to me, as some are very similar to begin with, or would likely happen in the wild anyway. Generally, if they are common in captivity and as long as they are identified as intergrades, I don't see a problem.
Hybrids can be beautiful, but what is the end game plan for making them, assuming they are sterile? Just 'cause? Again comes back to their rarity and the genetic cost associated to "wasting" that opportunity to make more of something at risk.
My biggest objection is the perpetuation of health problems. This is a personal opinion and I am absolutely not taking a shot at others who feel differently, but for example, I don't think spider Royals should be bred until we know more about their neuro issues. I have a long history breeding rabbits for show (as a kid), being around the dog breeding world, and breeding horses as a teen. A neurological issue like that would end a line in most cases. That is not to say that there are no problems in those worlds, cough cough German Shepherds, cough. Whoever decided to breed dogs with tendons so short they can't stand properly should be shot at sunrise.
However, I don't understand why the snake world has determinedly continued to breed an animal with a known problem. I do understand that we have not been able to identify that they are in pain and they do function to varying degrees, but when I see a bad example of the wobble, it makes me nauseous and I have to ask myself why we're doing this to them. Just because we love their combos? I would personally need a better reason than that to breed a spider even though I love how they look.
Acting responsibly, ethically, and morally can be an awkward, uncomfortable and difficult thing, no doubt.
__________________
JustBitten
1.0 pinstripe Royal (Monty)
1.0 R. leachianus Isle of Pines x Moro (StanleySteamer)
0.1 R. ciliatus high contrast tricolour (Ginny)
|
|
|
04-03-12, 10:32 AM
|
#21
|
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Sep-2011
Location: GTA
Age: 37
Posts: 4,303
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
I think this is a really good question and may give a lot of people food for thought. I have voted as well. I am very interested in the results
Very well written Todd
|
|
|
04-03-12, 10:38 AM
|
#22
|
Twist and Shout
Join Date: Dec-2011
Location: New York
Posts: 1,664
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
Most people keep snakes for amusement imo, a snake living in an enclosure is not natural in the first place. Given the reason we keep them in the first place I think there's nothing wrong with hybrids as long as whatever snakes that are being produced are healthy and cared for.
It's an ethical issue, however, because many keepers don't want others to "muddy up" the gene pool.
|
|
|
04-03-12, 10:54 AM
|
#23
|
Village Idiot
Join Date: Oct-2011
Age: 38
Posts: 7,360
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
Hehe. I know what everyone voted!
__________________
I used to be a nice guy but that don't get you anywhere. So now I'm just a piece of ****, idiot,
who's too stupid to care.
|
|
|
04-03-12, 11:43 AM
|
#24
|
Member
Join Date: Nov-2011
Posts: 145
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
crossing a milk snake and a rat snake or something in the same family in my opinion is not a immoral or unethical thing to do. I consider myself a member of the scientific community and I have never heard amongst my peers or superiors that hybrids are wrong. In fact a few doctors in the field of zoology are fascinated by hybrids and have tried to create a few to see where things genetically match up. Speciation means that the crosses may or may not occur in nature due to size, location, breeding habits, and mating times. Animals are not harmed and the offspring are viable and fertile with this type of cross. Seeing as no harm is done the only people to really get upset are people in the pet trade. They get upset because blood line might become muddied up. Something might be passed off as a corn snake when it is actually a rat/corn hybrid. So that deals with ethics and what is socially acceptable. To this day I still don’t understand why the snake community has such an issue with these types of crosses. Almost every other animal hobby out there contains crosses. Dog breeding, cat breeding, horse breeding, fish breeding, goats, cows, ducks, chickens… Not to mention some of these crosses happen naturally or are for the greater good of the animal. For example a dog that has a great dane sire and a collie mother is less likely to have the heath problems that a pure great dane would have. Hence lengthening the animals life and providing a better quality of life since there is no way the animal is inbred and the gene pool stays fresh.
Lets start with 100 unrelated corn snakes 50 male 50 female
If we take 1 male or female from each litter than after generation 2 we have 50 clean unrelated corns
Next generation 25
Next 12
6
3
Now we have a problem. Everything although distantly is related. We could inbreed which could cause health problems since genes work in pairs and the animal is more likely to inherit the defected gene. There are no more corn snakes. You had the last 100. Should you inbreed and risk passing on sickness and deformity or should you bring in some fresh genes from a closely related species? Personally I am strongly against inbreeding and would rather see the hybrid. Just my thoughts, sorry to offend.
Also as a side note hybrids are sterile crosses are not.
Horse x Donkey = not the same thing so steril
Wolf x Labradore = same thing and fertile (as a cladist i feel dometicus and lupus are incorrect but...)
__________________
2.0 Black Rat Snake 0.1.1 Corn Snake 1.0 Pueblan Milk Snake 1.1 Cali King 1.0 Pastel BP 0.1 BCI 1.0 Anery Boa 1.1 horses
|
|
|
04-03-12, 12:00 PM
|
#25
|
Village Idiot
Join Date: Oct-2011
Age: 38
Posts: 7,360
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
Quote:
Originally Posted by FangsAnarchy
crossing a milk snake and a rat snake or something in the same family in my opinion is not a immoral or unethical thing to do. I consider myself a member of the scientific community and I have never heard amongst my peers or superiors that hybrids are wrong. In fact a few doctors in the field of zoology are fascinated by hybrids and have tried to create a few to see where things genetically match up. Speciation means that the crosses may or may not occur in nature due to size, location, breeding habits, and mating times. Animals are not harmed and the offspring are viable and fertile with this type of cross. Seeing as no harm is done the only people to really get upset are people in the pet trade. They get upset because blood line might become muddied up. Something might be passed off as a corn snake when it is actually a rat/corn hybrid. So that deals with ethics and what is socially acceptable. To this day I still don’t understand why the snake community has such an issue with these types of crosses. Almost every other animal hobby out there contains crosses. Dog breeding, cat breeding, horse breeding, fish breeding, goats, cows, ducks, chickens… Not to mention some of these crosses happen naturally or are for the greater good of the animal. For example a dog that has a great dane sire and a collie mother is less likely to have the heath problems that a pure great dane would have. Hence lengthening the animals life and providing a better quality of life since there is no way the animal is inbred and the gene pool stays fresh.
Lets start with 100 unrelated corn snakes 50 male 50 female
If we take 1 male or female from each litter than after generation 2 we have 50 clean unrelated corns
Next generation 25
Next 12
6
3
Now we have a problem. Everything although distantly is related. We could inbreed which could cause health problems since genes work in pairs and the animal is more likely to inherit the defected gene. There are no more corn snakes. You had the last 100. Should you inbreed and risk passing on sickness and deformity or should you bring in some fresh genes from a closely related species? Personally I am strongly against inbreeding and would rather see the hybrid. Just my thoughts, sorry to offend.
Also as a side note hybrids are sterile crosses are not.
Horse x Donkey = not the same thing so steril
Wolf x Labradore = same thing and fertile (as a cladist i feel dometicus and lupus are incorrect but...)
|
So what your saying is eradicating the sub species is better than inbreeding?
__________________
I used to be a nice guy but that don't get you anywhere. So now I'm just a piece of ****, idiot,
who's too stupid to care.
|
|
|
04-03-12, 12:14 PM
|
#26
|
Member
Join Date: Nov-2011
Posts: 145
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
Yes, if it would happen in nature then yes 100% preserving a subspecies for no other reason than for the pet trade is just selfish. We lose sub species daily to speciation. Again, I know my thoughts are not shared by most.
__________________
2.0 Black Rat Snake 0.1.1 Corn Snake 1.0 Pueblan Milk Snake 1.1 Cali King 1.0 Pastel BP 0.1 BCI 1.0 Anery Boa 1.1 horses
|
|
|
04-03-12, 12:23 PM
|
#27
|
Lord of the Dums
Join Date: Sep-2011
Posts: 3,269
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaunyboy
being honest i have no issues with either,as long as its NOT producing snakes with health issues
intergrades i would not have included as they can and do happen in the wild
re morphs
again as long as their are not a lot of health issues,then i have no problem with it
cheers shaun
|
Ive done some thinking about this for a while. I am in agreement with Shaun on this one. I have no problems with hybrids as long as there are no resulting health issues and the breeder is forthright and upfront in explaining to the prospective buyer that it is a hybrid.
|
|
|
04-03-12, 02:38 PM
|
#28
|
Member
Join Date: Mar-2012
Location: Baltimore
Age: 39
Posts: 446
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lankyrob
Nive way to get us all thinking!!!
My PERSONAL thoughts are intergrades are much more likely to happen in nature than hybrids and therefor for people to breed them in captivity is fine.
|
None of what breeders do is natural anyway so I don't think this really matters either way. In nature, offspring are selected based on their ability to survive and reproduce. Their survival depends on their fitness for their particular environment, and stochastic events (doesn't matter how wonderful a baby is if a tree happens to fall on it before it can produce offspring). Passing on one's own genetics also depends on an individual's ability to find mates. If you live 9000 years but can't find a mate, you aren't going to figure into the gene pool.
In a breeding situation, we are choosing who to breed with whom. Even if you breed all wild-caught original lines or whatever, the breeder is going to have an influence anyway. Even if you randomly select pairs, you are still influencing the genetics. If you take a wild population and capture half the individuals and randomly breed them for 100 years, and then let the other half do it naturally, you'll undoubtedly have differences, even if the individuals in the two groups are exactly matched. As a breeder you have no way of determining which animal would have a better chance to mate in the wild, or which mother will be more likely to protect her eggs well in the wild, even if she does it fine in your plastic box.
My main point is that you can't be a purist or whatever you want to call it and preserve a natural gene pool anyway, so why pretend like you are? Since you are introducing artificial selection, or at the very least removing normal selective pressures, then why not have some fun?
No matter how hard you try, you're never going to be nature. So why bother trying?
__________________
1.0 Coastal Carpet Python, 1.0 Irian Jaya Carpet Python, 0.0.2 African Greys, 0.0.1 Senegal, 0.0.1 Mudskipper, 0.1 Wife
|
|
|
04-03-12, 04:10 PM
|
#29
|
Member
Join Date: Nov-2011
Posts: 145
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
Quote:
Originally Posted by hellosugaree
None of what breeders do is natural anyway so I don't think this really matters either way. In nature, offspring are selected based on their ability to survive and reproduce. Their survival depends on their fitness for their particular environment, and stochastic events (doesn't matter how wonderful a baby is if a tree happens to fall on it before it can produce offspring). Passing on one's own genetics also depends on an individual's ability to find mates. If you live 9000 years but can't find a mate, you aren't going to figure into the gene pool.
In a breeding situation, we are choosing who to breed with whom. Even if you breed all wild-caught original lines or whatever, the breeder is going to have an influence anyway. Even if you randomly select pairs, you are still influencing the genetics. If you take a wild population and capture half the individuals and randomly breed them for 100 years, and then let the other half do it naturally, you'll undoubtedly have differences, even if the individuals in the two groups are exactly matched. As a breeder you have no way of determining which animal would have a better chance to mate in the wild, or which mother will be more likely to protect her eggs well in the wild, even if she does it fine in your plastic box.
My main point is that you can't be a purist or whatever you want to call it and preserve a natural gene pool anyway, so why pretend like you are? Since you are introducing artificial selection, or at the very least removing normal selective pressures, then why not have some fun?
No matter how hard you try, you're never going to be nature. So why bother trying?
|
I agree!
Also just as a little fun fact there was a species of deer or moose (something with horns not antlers and yes I know deer and moose have antlers) that evolved its self out of existance. Females kept selecting males with the largest horns. So offspring kept being born with larger and larger horns. Eventually the horns became too large and too heavy and the males would snap their necks under the weight of the massive horns before reaching sexual maturity. So natural selection killed the species.
But yes I think hybrids are fine so long as no animal is harmed and they are marketed as such.
__________________
2.0 Black Rat Snake 0.1.1 Corn Snake 1.0 Pueblan Milk Snake 1.1 Cali King 1.0 Pastel BP 0.1 BCI 1.0 Anery Boa 1.1 horses
|
|
|
04-03-12, 04:15 PM
|
#30
|
Custos serpentium
Join Date: Oct-2011
Location: Ottawa
Age: 56
Posts: 1,410
Country:
|
Re: Breeding vs Morals and Ethics
Quote:
Originally Posted by FangsAnarchy
I agree!
Also just as a little fun fact there was a species of deer or moose (something with horns not antlers and yes I know deer and moose have antlers) that evolved its self out of existance. Females kept selecting males with the largest horns. So offspring kept being born with larger and larger horns. Eventually the horns became too large and too heavy and the males would snap their necks under the weight of the massive horns before reaching sexual maturity. So natural selection killed the species.
|
<insert absolutely dumbfounded look here> Like...what?! This is a serious thread. Keep the jokes for the Joke thread, okay? Okay!
__________________
TODD
25 years of commitment and responsibility in herpetoculture
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:09 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002-2023, Hobby Solutions.
|
|