Thread closed? (forbidden discussion topics)

[marisa]

But there already IS an abuse rule. People are NOT allowed to personally attack members. Is that the only rule? Of course not. But do you not agree that banning people on a individual basis is far more fair than just outright banning this person and that for breaking some set in stone rule?

I am unclear on what you want. You said you want a no abuse rule? But there IS one. So seriously, I am confused.

Marisa