View Single Post
Old 02-08-04, 02:11 PM   #7 (permalink)
Syco's Avatar
Join Date: Oct-2003
Location: Evansville,In
Age: 51
Posts: 419
I'm glad they got this corrected, but I wish it had been on the front page so that the correction would get as much attention as the original article.
Grant- I agree, there are so many attacts where dogs are identified as APBTs when in fact they have very little or no Pit in them at all. When they are identified as such in the paperwork then they are added to all the "Pit Bull statistics".
Our local humane society has so many dogs listed as Pit Bull mixes, when in fact they look to me to be more boxer, lab, ect... truth is, any large breed dog that they can't identify and looks even remotely like a Pit is labled as one. I think if one isn't for sure of a dogs breeding, they should be labled as "mixed breed" and left at that.
1.4 Ball Pythons,1.1 Greybanded Kings,1.1 Cal Kings,1.1 Brooksi, 0.1 Goini,2.1 Striped Motley Corns, 1.1 Normal Corns, 1.0 Ghost Motley Corn,0.2 Anery Corns, 0.1 Emoryi x Corn, 2.1 Western Hognose,1.1 Leucistic Texas Rats, 1.1 Mexican Black Kings
Syco is offline