Plagarism is the copy of 100% of the literature, which Zane <B>did not post</B>, even if it does seem closely worded. Copyright laws also do not matter once the subject has been changed to some degree. I think it is out of line to assume it is plagarism, for nothin was "Stolen" from any "Original Author" that I see.
A lot of information is based from these academics you so aptly named, for where else or we to get our information except from these or our own close observations? So must we quote <i>every single piece of "original thought or literature"</i>? I think everyones post would be lead to many referances on where they got their information in that case. Then what would be the point of sharing info after that??