Maybe I missed part of the article, but it doesn't really get into any detail. It says that the exhibition had animal housing that was "far from adequate". I don't understand....were you folks at the exhibit? Do you know first hand that the enclosures were actually adequate? If you are basing your opinions of that three paragraph article, you are probably as out of line as the persons responsible for the article.
Maybe they were inadequate? I don't know. I'm just saying with out any evidence either way, it isn't really prudent to judge. Being quick to judge, with out researching is what causes anti-reptile sentiment in the first place. Why take part in it?
0.0.1 Cal King 0.0.1 Redfoot 0.1 BRB 1.0 BP 0.1 Girlfriend